cms-pecos · CMS
cms-pecos · CMS
cms-pecos · CMS
cms-pecos · CMS
cms-pecos · CMS
CMS keeps a public ledger of who owns America's nursing homes. The PECOS Skilled Nursing Facility All Owners file, published monthly through the agency's data catalog under the Affordable Care Act's §6101 ownership-disclosure rule, lists every organization and individual disclosed as holding an ownership or operational interest in each Medicare- or Medicaid-certified skilled nursing facility. Read the current file and one fact dominates: the independent, single-home nursing facility — owned by the family that runs it — is now the exception. Most nursing homes belong to a group.
Most nursing homes belong to a multi-facility group
Of the 14,425 skilled nursing facilities in the file, 71.9% disclose at least one organization that also owns another facility — and only 28.1% are independent. Bucket every facility by the size of the largest group any of its organizational owners belongs to, and the distribution tilts hard toward scale.
| Largest owner group | Facilities | Share of file |
|---|---|---|
| Individual / family owned (no org owner) | 2,232 | 15.5% |
| Single-facility organization | 1,824 | 12.6% |
| 2–9 facilities | 2,822 | 19.6% |
| 10–49 facilities | 4,648 | 32.2% |
| 50–99 facilities | 1,807 | 12.5% |
| 100+ facilities | 1,092 | 7.6% |
Source: CMS PECOS SNF All Owners, every SNF enrollment classified by its largest organizational owner's reach, snapshot 2026-05-25.
The two independent categories together — facilities owned only by individuals, and facilities whose single organizational owner appears nowhere else — account for 4,056 facilities, 28.1% of the file. Everything above them is a group. The largest single bucket is the 10-to-49-facility regional operator (32.2%), and 52.3% of all nursing homes belong to a group of 10 or more. A facility that is part of a 100-plus-facility organization (7.6%) is now more common than one owned by a single-facility company.
A disclosed ownership relationship is a structural fact, not a Fonteum judgment. It records that an organization holds an ownership or operational interest in a facility — and says nothing this study adds about the care delivered inside it.
The concentration is top-heavy
The largest 10% of organizational owners account for 63.1% of every facility–owner relationship on file. Rank all 12,646 distinct owner organizations by how many facilities they touch, and the top decile — 1,265 organizations — holds 29,550 of the 46,832 facility–owner links. The floor of that decile is an organization tied to 7 facilities; the single most-disclosed organization appears as an owner of 249.
| Organization (disclosed owner / operator) | SNF facilities |
|---|---|
| PACS Holdings, LLC | 249 |
| PACS Group, Inc. | 248 |
| The Ensign Group, Inc. | 233 |
| Life Care Centers of America, Inc. | 194 |
| HCCF Management Group XI LLC | 187 |
| Gen Operations II LLC | 186 |
| ZAC Properties XI LLC | 186 |
| Gen Operations I LLC | 185 |
| Genesis Healthcare LLC | 184 |
| Genesis Healthcare, Inc. | 183 |
Source: CMS PECOS SNF All Owners, the ten organizations named on the most facility disclosures, deduped by owner PAC ID, snapshot 2026-05-25.
Two cautions make this table a floor on concentration, not a ceiling. First, CMS discloses each entity under its own owner PAC ID, and this study deduplicates by PAC ID rather than inferring corporate families — so affiliated entities within one company appear as separate rows. PACS Group, Inc. and PACS Holdings, LLC are disclosed separately; so are the several Genesis HealthCare operating entities. Resolving those families to a single beneficial owner would raise the per-company counts, never lower them. Second, the column counts disclosures, not control percentages: an organization may appear because it holds a 5% indirect interest or because it exercises operational control. The names here are organizations, the unit is a count, and no quality, conduct, or risk inference attaches to any of them.
Ownership is layered, not flat
The average nursing home discloses 3.8 organizations as owners; the median discloses 2, and the deepest discloses 99. A single skilled nursing facility rarely has one owner. The CMS-855A disclosure threads through direct owners, indirect parents, holding companies, property companies, and the operating company that runs the building day to day — each a separate disclosable organization.
That layering is why the simple question "who owns this nursing home?" has no single answer in the data, and why this study measures relationships rather than picking one owner per facility. The 46,832 facility–owner links across 12,193 facilities that disclose any organizational owner are the unit of concentration: a facility owned through a four-entity stack contributes four links, and the organization at the top of many such stacks is what the top-decile figure captures. The structure is a genuine feature of how nursing homes are held, not a quirk of the file.
The independent quarter is individuals, not a data gap
The 2,232 facilities that disclose no organizational owner at all are not missing data — they are owned and run by individuals. Among those facilities, 1,464 disclose an individual in operational or managerial control and 1,289 disclose an individual holding a 5%-or-greater direct ownership interest. These are the family- and individually-owned homes: the genuine independents, 15.5% of the national file. Add the 1,824 facilities whose only organizational owner is a single-facility company, and the independent share reaches 28.1% — a real and sizeable minority, but a minority all the same.
What one row actually is
Each row in snf_all_owners is one disclosed owner of one SNF enrollment: the owner's type (organization or individual), the role they hold, an association date, and — for organizations — a canonical owner PAC ID (associate_id_owner), which is the identifier this study deduplicates on rather than the free-text name. The companion snf_enrollments file carries one row per facility enrollment and the enrollment_id that joins the two. Counting and grouping these rows is the entire method here. The owner-to-entity-graph link is deferred, so ownership concentration renders on no individual provider profile. Every figure is a count at the facility, group, or organization level. No individual person is named, and the study makes no statement about the quality of care at any facility.
Methodology
All figures are direct aggregations over the snf_all_owners and snf_enrollments tables, populated from the CMS PECOS Skilled Nursing Facility All Owners public-use file (data.cms.gov, Provider Characteristics → Hospitals and Other Facilities). The owners table holds 280,207 owner rows across 14,425 SNF enrollments; snapshot date 2026-05-25; public, read-only; license US-Government-Works. The disclosure exists under the Affordable Care Act §6101 and 42 CFR §424.516, filed on form CMS-855A.
An organizational owner is a row with type_owner = 'O' and a role code in the ownership or operational-control set: 5%-or-greater direct (34) and indirect (35) ownership interest, other direct (85) and indirect (86) ownership interest, general (38) and limited (39) partnership interest, and operational/managerial control (43). The study deliberately excludes Additional Disclosable Parties (role 72 — accounting firms, banks, consultants), mortgage and security-interest holders (36, 37), corporate officers and directors (40, 41), managing employees and governing-body members (42, 25, 63), and trustees (71): parties CMS discloses but that are not owners or operators of the facility. Owner organizations are deduplicated by canonical PAC ID, never by name, because a single organization is disclosed under many name spellings. A facility's largest owner reach is the maximum number of facilities touched by any of its organizational owners; that value classifies the facility and drives the group-size buckets. Because these are counts and ratios over a published file, every figure is exact as of the snapshot rather than estimated. Methodology version: cms-snf-all-owners/v1. The source-provenance contract is documented in the provenance methodology.
Limitations
- A structural ownership measure, not a quality or conduct signal. Every figure counts disclosed ownership and operational relationships. It is unrelated to staffing, inspection findings, penalties, or any assessment of care, and naming an organization here is not a statement about its conduct. This study draws no such inference about any facility or owner.
- Aggregate and organization-level only. Figures are counts at the facility, group, or organization level. No individual person is named, and the owner-to-entity-graph link is deferred, so ownership concentration renders on no provider profile.
- PAC-ID dedup understates corporate-family concentration. Affiliated entities within one company are disclosed under separate PAC IDs and counted separately. The per-organization figures are therefore a floor; resolving beneficial owners would raise concentration, not lower it.
- Layering inflates raw owner counts, by design. A facility held through a multi-entity stack discloses each entity separately. The mean of 3.8 organizations per facility describes disclosure depth, not the number of independent parties with effective control.
- Snapshot, not a trend. Figures reflect the single file dated 2026-05-25. CMS refreshes the list monthly; indirect-ownership reporting in particular was sparse before October 2024, so historical comparisons are not drawn here.
- Disclosure completeness varies. The analysis takes CMS's disclosed roles as filed. A small number of facilities may under- or over-report owners relative to their true structure; the study counts what is on the record.
Sources
- CMS — PECOS Skilled Nursing Facility All Owners — the monthly public-use file behind every figure in this study.
- CMS — Ordering, certifying & enrolling: providers and suppliers — the Medicare enrollment program (PECOS) under which a facility files its ownership disclosure.
- 42 CFR §424.516 — Additional provider and supplier requirements for enrolling — the disclosure rule, enacted under Affordable Care Act §6101, that requires SNFs to report their owners.
The companion SNF All Owners data explorer exposes the underlying records, and the PECOS enrollment dataset page covers the enrollment side of the same source. This is the ownership mirror of where nursing-home penalties concentrate and of the facilities reporting zero registered-nurse days; for who is enrolled to bill Medicare in the first place see the changing shape of Medicare enrollment, and for the same concentration lens on other corners of health care, the hospital distress behind rural-access gaps, how Medicare Part D spending concentrates in a handful of drugs, and how industry research dollars concentrate among a few recipients.
Frequently asked questions
- How concentrated is nursing-home ownership in the United States?
- Heavily. Of the 14,425 skilled nursing facilities in CMS's PECOS All Owners file, 71.9% disclose at least one organization that also owns other facilities, and 52.3% belong to a group of 10 or more. The largest 10% of organizational owners account for 63.1% of all 46,832 facility–owner relationships on file.
- What counts as a nursing-home chain in this data?
- This study calls a facility chain-affiliated when at least one of its disclosed organizational owners — deduped by CMS owner PAC ID — also appears as an owner of one or more other facilities. It is a structural count of shared ownership, not a brand or a legal definition of a corporate group.
- Who are the largest nursing-home owners?
- By the number of facilities where they appear as a disclosed owner or operator, the largest organizations include PACS Group and PACS Holdings, The Ensign Group, Life Care Centers of America, and several Genesis HealthCare entities — each named on roughly 180 to 250 facilities. These are organizations, not individuals, and the figure is a count of disclosures, not a judgment about any of them.
- Does this study say anything about care quality?
- No. It is a structural ownership measure built only from who is disclosed as owning or operating each facility. It draws no inference about staffing, inspection results, penalties, or the quality of care, and naming an organization here is not a statement about its conduct. Quality and enforcement are separate datasets covered in other Fonteum studies.
- Why are PACS Group and PACS Holdings listed separately?
- Because CMS discloses them under separate owner PAC IDs, and this study deduplicates by PAC ID rather than guessing which entities share a parent. Related entities within one corporate family — operating companies, property companies, and holding companies — therefore appear as distinct rows. That means true family-level concentration is at least as high as the per-organization figures shown, not lower.
- How many nursing homes are truly independent?
- About 28.1% — 4,056 of 14,425 facilities. Of those, 2,232 (15.5%) disclose no organizational owner at all and are owned and run by individuals or families, while 1,824 (12.6%) disclose a single organization that is tied to no other facility. The remaining 71.9% are part of a multi-facility group.
- What ownership roles does the study count?
- Direct and indirect ownership interests of 5% or greater, other direct and indirect ownership interests, general and limited partnership interests, and operational or managerial control. It deliberately excludes Additional Disclosable Parties such as accounting firms and banks, mortgage and security-interest holders, corporate officers and directors, managing employees, and trustees — parties CMS discloses but that do not own or operate the facility.
- Can I reproduce these figures?
- Yes. Every number is a direct count over the public snf_all_owners and snf_enrollments tables — CMS's PECOS SNF All Owners file, snapshot dated 2026-05-25 — with no modeling. The exact SQL for the chain split, the group-size distribution, the top-decile concentration, and the layering depth is published in the reproducibility block below.
Who uses this data
The source data behind this study is public
Compliance teams, journalists, and researchers work from the same federal source families cited above — queried by NPI or facility identifier through Fonteum’s open dataset pages and API. Every figure traces to a frozen, downloadable snapshot you can reproduce yourself.
Datasets used
Reproducibility
Every claim, reproducible
The SQL
-- Who owns America's nursing homes — and how concentrated that ownership is.
-- Fully reproducible query.
--
-- Question: across the skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) in CMS's PECOS "SNF
-- All Owners" disclosure file, how many are tied to a multi-facility
-- ORGANIZATION (a chain/group) versus owned by a single-facility entity or by
-- individuals, and how concentrated is the organizational ownership? The lead
-- figure: of 14,425 SNF enrollments, only 4,056 (28.1%) are independent — owned
-- by individuals or by an organization that appears on no other facility — while
-- 10,369 (71.9%) disclose at least one organization that also owns other
-- facilities, and 7,547 (52.3%) belong to a group of 10 or more facilities.
--
-- This is a STRUCTURAL ownership measure only. It counts disclosed ownership
-- and operational-control relationships. It is NOT a quality, fraud, conduct,
-- or risk signal of any kind, and no individual person is named.
--
-- Sources:
-- public.snf_all_owners — CMS PECOS "Skilled Nursing Facility All Owners"
-- file. One row per owner per SNF enrollment. 280,207 rows; snapshot
-- 2026-05-25. associate_id_owner is the canonical owner identifier (PAC ID)
-- — chains are deduped by PAC ID, NOT by name.
-- public.snf_enrollments — companion PECOS "SNF Enrollments" file. One row per
-- SNF enrollment (14,425). enrollment_id is the join key to snf_all_owners.
-- Both: CMS PECOS SNF All Owners, https://data.cms.gov/provider-characteristics/
-- hospitals-and-other-facilities/skilled-nursing-facility-all-owners
-- Public, read-only. License: US-Government-Works (17 U.S.C. Sec. 105).
-- Authorizing statute: ACA Section 6101; 42 CFR Sec. 424.516; CMS-855A.
--
-- Owner roles used as ORGANIZATIONAL OWNERSHIP / OPERATIONAL CONTROL throughout:
-- 34 = 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
-- 35 = 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
-- 85 = DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
-- 86 = INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
-- 43 = OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
-- 38 = GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST
-- 39 = LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST
-- DELIBERATELY EXCLUDED: role 72 (ADP — Additional Disclosable Party, e.g.
-- accounting firms, banks, consultants), 36/37 (mortgage/security interest =
-- lenders), 40/41 (corporate officer/director), 42/25/63 (managing employees,
-- governing body), 71 (trustee). Those parties are disclosed but are not
-- owners or operators of the facility.
-- ============================================================================
-- (1) Universe reconciliation — the two PECOS files at a glance.
-- ============================================================================
SELECT
(SELECT count(*) FROM public.snf_enrollments) AS snf_enrollments,
(SELECT count(*) FROM public.snf_all_owners) AS owner_rows,
(SELECT count(DISTINCT associate_id_owner) FROM public.snf_all_owners
WHERE type_owner = 'O') AS distinct_org_pac_ids,
(SELECT count(DISTINCT associate_id_owner) FROM public.snf_all_owners
WHERE type_owner = 'I') AS distinct_individual_pac_ids,
(SELECT max(snapshot_date) FROM public.snf_all_owners) AS snapshot;
-- snf_enrollments 14,425 · owner_rows 280,207 · distinct_org_pac_ids 26,453
-- distinct_individual_pac_ids 58,866 · snapshot 2026-05-25
-- ============================================================================
-- (2) HEADLINE: chain vs independent. For each SNF, find the largest "reach"
-- (number of facilities owned) of any of its organizational owners, then
-- classify the facility. Independents = facilities with no organizational
-- owner (individually/family owned) or whose only org owner appears on that
-- one facility. Chain-affiliated = an org owner that also owns >=1 other SNF.
-- ============================================================================
WITH org_owner AS (
SELECT DISTINCT associate_id_owner, enrollment_id
FROM public.snf_all_owners
WHERE type_owner = 'O'
AND role_code_owner IN ('34','35','85','86','43','38','39')
),
reach AS ( -- how many facilities each organizational owner touches
SELECT associate_id_owner, count(DISTINCT enrollment_id) AS r
FROM org_owner GROUP BY associate_id_owner
),
fac AS ( -- per facility: the largest reach among its organizational owners
SELECT oo.enrollment_id, max(rr.r) AS mr
FROM org_owner oo JOIN reach rr USING (associate_id_owner)
GROUP BY oo.enrollment_id
),
allf AS ( -- every enrollment, NULL mr = no organizational owner disclosed
SELECT e.enrollment_id, f.mr
FROM public.snf_enrollments e LEFT JOIN fac f USING (enrollment_id)
)
SELECT
count(*) AS total_snfs,
count(*) FILTER (WHERE mr >= 2) AS chain_affiliated,
round(100.0 * count(*) FILTER (WHERE mr >= 2) / count(*), 1) AS chain_pct,
count(*) FILTER (WHERE mr >= 10) AS in_group_10plus,
round(100.0 * count(*) FILTER (WHERE mr >= 10) / count(*), 1) AS group_10plus_pct,
count(*) FILTER (WHERE mr IS NULL OR mr = 1) AS independent,
round(100.0 * count(*) FILTER (WHERE mr IS NULL OR mr = 1) / count(*), 1) AS independent_pct
FROM allf;
-- total_snfs 14,425 · chain_affiliated 10,369 (71.9%) · in_group_10plus 7,547 (52.3%)
-- independent 4,056 (28.1%)
-- ============================================================================
-- (3) HERO: the group-size distribution. Every SNF bucketed by the size of the
-- largest facility-group any of its organizational owners belongs to.
-- ============================================================================
WITH org_owner AS (
SELECT DISTINCT associate_id_owner, enrollment_id
FROM public.snf_all_owners
WHERE type_owner = 'O' AND role_code_owner IN ('34','35','85','86','43','38','39')
),
reach AS (SELECT associate_id_owner, count(DISTINCT enrollment_id) r FROM org_owner GROUP BY 1),
fac AS (SELECT oo.enrollment_id, max(rr.r) mr FROM org_owner oo JOIN reach rr USING (associate_id_owner) GROUP BY 1),
allf AS (SELECT e.enrollment_id, f.mr FROM public.snf_enrollments e LEFT JOIN fac f USING (enrollment_id))
SELECT
CASE WHEN mr IS NULL THEN '0 individually/family owned'
WHEN mr = 1 THEN '1 single-facility org'
WHEN mr BETWEEN 2 AND 9 THEN '2-9 facilities'
WHEN mr BETWEEN 10 AND 49 THEN '10-49 facilities'
WHEN mr BETWEEN 50 AND 99 THEN '50-99 facilities'
ELSE '100+ facilities' END AS group_size,
count(*) AS snfs,
round(100.0 * count(*) / sum(count(*)) OVER (), 1) AS pct
FROM allf
GROUP BY 1 ORDER BY min(coalesce(mr, -1));
-- 0 individually/family owned 2,232 15.5%
-- 1 single-facility org 1,824 12.6%
-- 2-9 facilities 2,822 19.6%
-- 10-49 facilities 4,648 32.2%
-- 50-99 facilities 1,807 12.5%
-- 100+ facilities 1,092 7.6%
-- ============================================================================
-- (4) The concentration tail. Rank every organizational owner by reach and take
-- the top decile. The largest 10% of owner organizations account for the
-- majority of all facility-owner relationships on file.
-- ============================================================================
WITH org_owner AS (
SELECT DISTINCT associate_id_owner, enrollment_id
FROM public.snf_all_owners
WHERE type_owner = 'O' AND role_code_owner IN ('34','35','85','86','43','38','39')
),
reach AS (SELECT associate_id_owner, count(DISTINCT enrollment_id) r FROM org_owner GROUP BY 1),
ranked AS (SELECT associate_id_owner, r, ntile(10) OVER (ORDER BY r DESC) decile FROM reach)
SELECT
count(*) AS owner_orgs,
sum(r) AS facility_owner_links,
sum(r) FILTER (WHERE decile = 1) AS top_decile_links,
round(100.0 * sum(r) FILTER (WHERE decile = 1) / sum(r), 1) AS top_decile_pct,
min(r) FILTER (WHERE decile = 1) AS top_decile_floor_reach,
max(r) AS max_reach
FROM ranked;
-- owner_orgs 12,646 · facility_owner_links 46,832 · top_decile_links 29,550
-- top_decile_pct 63.1% · top_decile_floor_reach 7 · max_reach 249
-- ============================================================================
-- (5) The largest disclosed organizations, deduped by canonical PAC ID. Column
-- is "SNF enrollments where the organization appears as an owner/operator."
-- NOTE: related entities within one corporate family are disclosed under
-- SEPARATE PAC IDs and so list separately — e.g. PACS Group, Inc. and PACS
-- Holdings, LLC; the several Genesis HealthCare operating entities. This is
-- a count of disclosed organizations, NOT resolved beneficial owners; true
-- family-level concentration is therefore AT LEAST what is shown here. No
-- quality, conduct, or risk inference attaches to any organization listed.
-- ============================================================================
WITH org_owner AS (
SELECT associate_id_owner AS pac, enrollment_id,
nullif(trim(organization_name_owner), '') AS nm
FROM public.snf_all_owners
WHERE type_owner = 'O' AND role_code_owner IN ('34','35','85','86','43','38','39')
),
nm AS ( -- representative display name per PAC ID (most frequent non-blank name)
SELECT pac, nm, row_number() OVER (PARTITION BY pac ORDER BY count(*) DESC) rn
FROM org_owner WHERE nm IS NOT NULL GROUP BY pac, nm
)
SELECT n.nm AS owner_org, o.pac AS pac_id,
count(DISTINCT o.enrollment_id) AS snf_enrollments
FROM org_owner o JOIN nm n ON n.pac = o.pac AND n.rn = 1
GROUP BY n.nm, o.pac
ORDER BY snf_enrollments DESC
LIMIT 12;
-- PACS Holdings, LLC 6103289202 249
-- PACS Group, Inc. 7911360011 248
-- The Ensign Group Inc 3476460494 233
-- Life Care Centers Of America 6608783543 194
-- HCCF Management Group XI LLC 1456511880 187
-- Gen Operations II LLC 2769671536 186
-- ZAC Properties XI LLC 7911167341 186
-- Gen Operations I LLC 1759570526 185
-- Genesis Healthcare LLC 6305035171 184
-- Genesis Healthcare Inc 7810077864 183
-- Providence Group NH, LLC 5294198396 178
-- Sun Healthcare Group Inc 6507774304 177
-- ============================================================================
-- (6) Ownership is layered, not flat. How many DISTINCT organizational owners
-- each facility discloses across direct + indirect + operational layers.
-- ============================================================================
WITH oo AS (
SELECT enrollment_id, count(DISTINCT associate_id_owner) AS n_org_owners
FROM public.snf_all_owners
WHERE type_owner = 'O' AND role_code_owner IN ('34','35','85','86','43','38','39')
GROUP BY enrollment_id
)
SELECT
count(*) AS facilities_with_org_owner,
round(avg(n_org_owners), 1) AS mean_org_owners,
percentile_cont(0.5) WITHIN GROUP (ORDER BY n_org_owners) AS median_org_owners,
max(n_org_owners) AS max_org_owners
FROM oo;
-- facilities_with_org_owner 12,193 · mean_org_owners 3.8 · median_org_owners 2
-- max_org_owners 99
-- ============================================================================
-- (7) The independent minority, characterized. Of the 2,232 SNFs with NO
-- organizational owner disclosed, what roles ARE disclosed? They are owned
-- and run by individuals — confirming these are genuinely independent, not
-- a data gap.
-- ============================================================================
WITH has_org AS (
SELECT DISTINCT enrollment_id FROM public.snf_all_owners
WHERE type_owner = 'O' AND role_code_owner IN ('34','35','85','86','43','38','39')
)
SELECT o.type_owner, o.role_text_owner,
count(DISTINCT o.enrollment_id) AS facilities
FROM public.snf_all_owners o
WHERE o.enrollment_id NOT IN (SELECT enrollment_id FROM has_org)
GROUP BY o.type_owner, o.role_text_owner
ORDER BY facilities DESC
LIMIT 6;
-- I · OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL 1,464
-- I · CORPORATE OFFICER 1,371
-- I · 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST 1,289
-- I · CORPORATE DIRECTOR 1,110
-- I · W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE 1,052
-- I · ADP OF THE SNF 1,018The snapshot
| dataset_id | cms-pecos |
| snapshot_date | 2026-05-25 |
| sha256 | |
| doi | 10.5072/fonteum/nursing-home-ownership-concentration-2026 |
| slsa_provenance_url |
The JOINs
universe: snf_enrollments, one row per SNF enrollment -- 14,425 enrollments, snapshot 2026-05-25 organizational owner = snf_all_owners type_owner='O' AND role_code IN (34,35,85,86,43,38,39) -- ownership + operational-control roles; ADP/lenders/officers excluded owner reach = count(DISTINCT enrollment_id) per associate_id_owner (PAC ID, not name) -- chains deduped by canonical owner PAC ID facility class = max owner reach: NULL/1 = independent, >=2 = chain-affiliated -- independent 4,056 (28.1%), chain 10,369 (71.9%) group-size buckets over max owner reach -- 10+ group = 7,547 (52.3%); 100+ = 1,092 (7.6%) concentration: ntile(10) over owner reach -- top decile = 63.1% of 46,832 facility–owner links; max reach 249 layering = count(DISTINCT associate_id_owner) per enrollment -- mean 3.8, median 2, max 99 organizations per facility
The pipeline version
| git_sha | |
| slsa_provenance | |
| methodology_version | cms-snf-all-owners/v1 |
Reproduce this
Run the exact query against the frozen 2026-05-25.
Cite this study
Citation-ready for researchers and AI.
Check the chain
Each figure is snapshot-attested — re-derive the hash from the federal file.
cms-pecos · 2026-05-25SHA-256 a3f1c9…7e6b- FINANCIAL DISTRESS · JUN 2026Where nursing-home penalties concentrate: a repeat-citation story, 2026Between May 2023 and April 2026, CMS imposed $459.3M in civil money penalties and 2,513 payment denials on 6,884 nursing facilities. Enforcement concentrates: the 53.7% of penalized facilities cited more than once carry 80.1% of the fine dollars and 90.6% of the payment denials — the half cited once drew a fifth of the money.
- WORKFORCE · JUN 2026Zero-RN days: how often US nursing homes ran a day with no registered nurse on the floorIn the CMS Payroll-Based Journal's 2025 Q2 snapshot, 5.86% of nursing-home facility-days with residents present recorded zero registered-nurse direct-care hours — 77,542 days across 5,062 facilities. The rate ranged from 27.9% in Louisiana to 0.2% in Rhode Island. Days before the federal staffing floor was rescinded, this is the baseline the country now keeps.
- WORKFORCE · JUN 2026Who is enrolled in Medicare? The nurse practitioner is now the most common clinician413,539 nurse practitioner enrollments make NPs the single most common clinician type in Medicare's provider-enrollment file — 13.9% of all 2.98 million PECOS records, nearly triple the largest physician specialty. Together, NPs and physician assistants are one in five enrollments. Advanced-practice providers now anchor the Medicare workforce.
- FINANCIAL DISTRESS · JUN 2026Rural hospital closures, by the numbers: which hospitals are most at riskRural Critical Access Hospitals — the small facilities at the center of the closure crisis — run a 50.4% financial-distress rate, against 39.2% for urban hospitals, across 6,019 Medicare hospitals in the federal HCRIS cost reports. Their average operating margin is −8.93%, and 682 are losing money on patient care.
- FINANCIAL DISTRESS · JUN 2026The few drugs that drive most of Medicare's Part D bill, 2023Medicare Part D paid $275.9 billion for 3,598 drugs in 2023. The 100 costliest — just 2.8% of the list — account for $176.2 billion, 63.8% of the bill. Ten drugs alone are a quarter of it, and 61.5% of priced drugs cost more per dose than a year earlier.
Federal source citations
Fonteum Research · June 16, 2026 · All figures trace to the frozen federal-data snapshot cited above.